Featured

Remove Rep. Ilhan Omar from the House Foreign Affairs Committee

Jacob Wohl started a Petition

Remove Rep. Ilhan Omar from the House Foreign Affairs Committee

185K supporters have signed

Have you?


 

Remove Rep. Ilhan Omar from the House Foreign Affairs Committee

 

Rep. Ilhan Omar was flagged during the campaign for having a proclivity towards making antisemitic remarks, while refusing to condemn terror groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.

Upon being elected to the House of Representatives, Speaker Nancy Pelosi placed Rep. Omar on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which is critical in steering America’s foreign policy. Since taking office, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s antisemitism has continued, and even escalated.

She blamed Jewish Money for America’s pro-Israeli foreign policy and invoked “Benjamin’s Baby” as an antisemitic trope aimed at Jared Kushner.

Enough is enough! It’s time for Rep. Ilhan Omar to be removed from the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

EXPOSED: Corbyn, UK Labour Party Tied to Hamas Network

United With Israel

Hamas officials in the Gaza Strip and London’s Hamas institutions have joined forces to support Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, ahead of the upcoming UK elections this week.

By Baruch Yedid, TPS

One of Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn’s largest support networks is managed from the Gaza Strip, with the knowledge and involvement of the Hamas leadership, TPS has learned.

The multifaceted relationship between Hamas and the Labour Party exists through a large number of organizations, forums, media outlets and activities on social networks. These Hamas organizations are actively engaged in the efforts in recent weeks to secure Corbyn’s election.

The “We support Jeremy Corbyn” Facebook page, with some 72,000 followers, is one of the largest and most important of the Corbyn support organizations across the world.

Walid Abu Rouk, a resident of Khan Yunis in the Gaza Strip, managed the page for over two years. In June 2017, Labour activists decided to add Abu Rouk as a manager to the page, declaring him their representative in the Gaza Strip.

Labour activists have conducted several fundraising campaigns for his projects in Gaza during this time. Labour activists describe Abu Rouk as a staunch supporter of Corbyn and declared that he is “our man in Gaza.”

Speaking to TPS, Abu Rouk said he had served as the page manager until recently, but he still maintains relationships with Corbyn’s party activists.

Labour activists in London have directed supporters to contact Abu Rouk and receive information and publications from him, but he is no simple social activist. The findings and evidence indicate that his relationship with Labour does not exist in a vacuum. Abu Rouk is a central link within the hidden relationship that serves Hamas in its political relations with Labour, and that may be what prompted Labour activists to appoint him as the director of the Facebook page from the Gaza Strip.

A source in the Gaza Strip told TPS that “Abu Rouk serves Hamas’ information campaign and is guided by it.”

Another official in the Gaza Strip, who asked to speak on condition of anonymity, told TPS that Abu Rouk is an important link in Hamas’ English-language propaganda system and that he operates under Hamas’ guidance. As a violent terror dictatorship, Hamas does not allow free media activity in the Gaza Strip.

Additional research conducted by TPS through a third-party conduit with Hamas officials, also indicates that Abu Rouk operates under Hamas’ directive and is being guided by it because of his command of the English language.

Social Media Manipulation

In recent years, Hamas’ internal security apparatus has placed its people in the offices of important media outlets in the Gaza Strip and in control of Facebook pages. News site owners and page managers on social networks have been required to give Hamas members access to their sites’ domains and management of their social media pages.

The same is true of Abu Rouk, one of the founders of the GP + media site in the Gaza Strip. The reporters writing for the site are supervised by Muhammad Ibrahim Madhun, a journalist who is often quoted by leading international media outlets as a Hamas affiliate. Madhun is also involved in illegal activities. A source in the Gaza Strip claims that several years ago, Madhun hosted a planning session of the Hamas military wing in one of the GP + offices. The office was bombed shortly afterward by Israel.

Abu Rouk said in a phone call with TPS that he writes for Aljazeera, the Qatari news network affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, for the PALESTINE 24 website and for the Middle East Eye website. These sites are affiliated with Hamas.

Abu Rouk also writes for the London-based Memo Monitor newspaper, which is considered one of the UK’s Muslim Brotherhood’s media sites. Memo’s editor is Daoud Abdullah, one of the Muslim Brotherhood’s top British leaders. Another senior official is Ibrahim Hewitt, who is also affiliated with the Brotherhood in the UK.

Memo monitor writers often express support for Corbyn and the Labour party, and the party receives particularly sympathetic coverage by the Memo website.

Speaking to TPS, Abu Rouk specifically stated that he agrees to work with the Israeli media, which he usually boycotts, only if it is done through the Memo office in London.

Another senior reporter at Memo is Motasem Dalloul, a resident of the Gaza Strip. Dalloul edits the website “Days of Palestine” which is affiliated with Hamas. A source in the Gaza Strip reports that Dalloul is one of the leaders of Hamas’ English language propaganda campaign. He also edits the English content on Hamas’ official Al-Risala website.

Connecting the Dots

Abu Rouk readily admits to his work in the various media outlets, which are affiliated with Hamas, and the fact that he ran the Corbyn support page, alongside Labour activists, but he denies any connection to Dalloul. Dalloul also claims that he does not know Abu Rouk. The two, residents of the Gaza Strip, work for the same newspapers, which express open support for Corbyn and identify with Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, yet they deny any connection or acquaintance. However, when Dalloul was injured several years ago, Abu Rouk took to social media to post his well wishes and prayers for his “dearest friend” Dalloul.

In addition to his activities in media outlets of extreme Islamic nature, Abu Rouk advocates for the boycott of the Israeli media. Like him, Corbyn’s support page is boycotting important British media sources and prohibits the uploading of content or links from the Daily Mail and the London Sun.

Abu Rouk is a BDS activist involved in several BDS organizations. He writes for Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), an organization known for its extreme positions and its support for boycotts of Israel and its ties with BDS movement. He also promotes the so-called Freedom Flotillas to the Gaza Strip on behalf of a British organization called Viva Palestina.

Viva Palestina was founded by former British Labour Member of Parliament George Galloway, who was expelled from the party over anti-Semitism. Kevin O’Banden, the association’s secretary-general, met with Hamas leader Khaled Mashal in the Gaza Strip in 2009, as Galloway’s deputy.

Another one of the organizers in the flotilla effort is Khadijah Hassan, a supporter of Corbyn.

Hassan, British in origin, converted to Islam and moved to the Gaza Strip under the auspices of the Hamas Religious Scholars Association. She is active in Labour and most of her activities are in the boycott organizations against Israel.

Viva Palestina, which is registered in the UK, operates under the instructions of senior Hamas official Zaher Birawi, who has also been identified by Israel’s security service as one of the top Hamas representatives in the United Kingdom. A source in the Gaza Strip told TPS that Birawi is responsible for all Hamas-UK relations and they call him the holder of the “Corbyn-Hamas file.”

The Annexation Myth

Benjamin Netanyahu: “The time has come to apply Israeli sovereignty over the Jordan Valley and to also arrange the status of all Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, those within the blocs and those not within the blocs. They will be part of the State of Israel.”
NOTICE he did not say Annexation? The definition of Annexation (Latin ad, to, and nexus, joining) is the administrative action and concept in international law relating to the forcible acquisition of one state’s territory by another state and is generally held to be an illegal act.
In order for Israel to annex the Jordan Valley and Judea and Samaria/Shomron, the territory would have to belong to another sovereignty. The San Remo resolution by the League of Nations gave sovereign title of all of Eretz Yisrael to the Jewish Community via the Mandate for Palestine.
The act of applying sovereignty is not the same as annexation as one applies sovereignty to territory that is already under one’s sovereign title by treaty law (Treaties of Sevres, Versailles and the Israeli-Jordanian Peace Treaty) …!

Surely one would not espouse that Eretz Yisrael is the sovereign territory of the “All Palestine government” which was seated in Gaza and led by Haj Amin al Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem!!!

‘Israel must prepare for an Iranian attack in the near future’

Arab affairs correspondent Zvi Yehezkeli says both Israel and US understand Iran may attack again in the near future.

103 FM, 06/12/19 14:54

 

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani

Reuters

Zvi Yehezkeli, Channel 13‘s Arab affairs correspondent, warned that the US forces said that Iran is prepared to launch another provocative attack.

“US reports show that the Iranians are prepared for another provocative attack,” Yehezkeli told 103FM Radio. “The assumption that the more Iranians are worried about their home, the less likely they are to attack outsiders is mistaken. That’s why this meeting was held, and that’s the reason for the US pressure. The Iranians understand that their strength comes from provoking the West, that that’s where they build their strength and build their deterrence.”

“It’s clear that in the US, [US President Donald] Trump doesn’t want to be militarily involved with Iran. They prefer sanctions. But that is also provocative. Look at the maps of where Iran’s weapons are located, they’ve placed medium-range weapons in Iraq, they sent parts of advanced weapons to Yemen, they increased their presence in Syria, and it doesn’t stop. I think that the Israeli attacks or American shouts do not stop the Iranians. That’s the bottom line regarding what’s happening in the area right now.

When you talk about the Iranians preparing for more attacks, does that include possibly against us as well?

“Yes. Don’t forget that we’re still preparing. I will remind you that we still have a score to settle with them after their last attack in Syria, when they fired some missiles at Mount Hermon and Israel began a widescale attack. You think the Iranians forgot about that? That Qasem Soleimani fell asleep? No. There’s a saying that ‘revenge is best served cold,’ or very cold, if we’re talking about the Iranians.”

Meaning you think Israel should be preparing for that possibility?

“Yes, I think that Israel is already preparing for that possibility. You don’t need secret reports in order to see that the Americans’ behavior and the Israelis’ behavior says that the Iranians are working on a kind of provocative attack. I don’t know how strong it’ll be or where exactly it’ll be, but we’ve seen at lesat six of those kinds of attacks throughout this year.

“I’ll note the large attack on a Saudi oil field, as well as the downing of a US UAV and the suspicious sinking of ships in the Hormuz Straits. There are a lot of ways to provoke – with approval, without approval. But what we do need to understand is that the Iranians are working on it

“This week in The New York Times there was a horrific article about 100 protesters [in Iran] who hid in a sugar cane field and thought the Revolutionary Guards didn’t see them. They surrounded them quietly and murdered all of the 100 by shooting at them, until the families came and evacuated their bodies. That’s Iran today, and if you think that the protests there weakened it – exactly the opposite is happening. Note that the more Iran chokes from sanctions, the more it attacks the region. Note the huge rise in the number of attacks agaiinst Israeli, Arab, and US interests in the region.”

So Israel is preparing, or needs to prepare, for an Iranian attack.

“Certainly. Both the Israelis and the Americans are preparing for a kind of Iranian reaction, which will certainly come at some point in the future.”

Bennett to EU: ‘We’ll destroy your construction in Area C’

Defense Min. Bennett: Funding illegal construction in Judea and Samaria a ‘waste of money.’

 

Arutz Sheva Staff, 06/12/19 11:41

 

Naftali Bennett

Naftali Bennett                                                                                                                Reuters

Defense Minister Naftali Bennett (New Right) met this week with European Union’s (EU) ambassador in Israel, telling him that Israel’s defense organizations are no longer willing to make peace with the uncontrolled illegal construction in Area C encouraged and funded by Europe.

According to a Makor Rishon report, Bennett said that the defense system intends to destroy all illegal construction in areas under complete Israeli control, including that which Europeans funded.

Attending the meeting were representatives from Germany, France, Italy, Holland, and Denmark.

In a security briefing, Bennett spoke with the representatives about the actions Israel took to prevent Iran from entrenching itself in Syria, the situation with Gaza, and the illegal construction in Area C of Judea and Samaria, which he described as “a waste of money.”

“If you want to invest in the Palestinians, it’s worth focusing on humanitarian activities and not illegal construction,” Bennett said.

The representatives responded negatively to the statement, but did not argue.

Under the Oslo Accords, Judea and Samaria were divided into three parts: Area A is under full Palestinian Authority (PA) civil and security control. Area B is under PA civil control, while Israel controls security. Area C is under full Israeli civil and security control.

While Arabs live in all three areas, Jews are confined to Area C only, and accidentally entering Area A presents a risk to a Jew’s life.

For several years, the EU has been breaching the Oslo Accords by funding an “illegal PA takeover” of Area C, in an attempt to allow the PA to annex it illegally.

Parsha Ve’Yetze : What’s mine is yours….

“This is none other than the house of G-d”

(Genesis 28:17)

Kislev 8, 5780/December 6, 2019

A beautiful thing happened on Yaakov avinu’s (our patriarch Jacob) way to Haran. Yaakov was both fleeing from the wrath of his brother Esau, (who swore to kill Yaakov after Yaakov, disguised as Esau, received father Yitzchak’s blessing that was intended for Esau), and was also journeying to his mother’s home town of Haran, in pursuit of a suitable bride for himself. Simultaneously fleeing from danger and setting out in search of his destiny, Yaakov makes a stop at nightfall in a place called Luz, gathers twelves stones together and places them, perhaps for protection from wild beasts, (as our sages suggest), around his head, and lays down to sleep.

“Vayasem mera’ashotav -and he placed them at his head,” (Genesis 28:11) is an unusual use of Hebrew to express the simple action that Yaakov was taking, and is, in fact, just one of many half-hidden clues embedded in our story, intimating the far-reaching significance of what is really transpiring. “Mera’ashotav – at his head,” is strikingly reminiscent of Torah’s very first word, “Beresheet – in the beginning,” and this similarity, in conjunction with the Hebrew word “Hamakom – the place” and the mention of stones (avanim), leads us to understand that the Torah is in fact teaching us about the Foundation Stone – even hashetiyah – from which the world was created in the beginning of time. This Foundation Stone, of course, is the very same Foundation Stone upon which the Ark of the Covenant rests in the Holy of Holies in the Holy Temple on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem! And the expression HaMakom – The Place – refers to none other than the place of the Holy Temple. Yaakov was speaking the truth when, upon awakening from his visionary dream, he stated, “‘Indeed, HaShem is in this place (HaMakom), and I did not know it… How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of G-d, and this is the gate of heaven.'” (ibid 28:16-17)

Having dreamed of a ladder planted firmly on the earth and extending to the heavens, with angels ascending and descending, Yaakov couldn’t have been more on the mark in his realization upon wakening, that this place, this same place where Avraham bound his son Yitzchak upon G-d’s command, and where Noach and Cain and Abel and Adam and Chava all built their altars in previous generations, was the House of G-d, the property of HaShem. And Yaakov was startled and even terrified when he made this discovery.

But Yaakov’s discovery upon awakening was in direct contradiction to the message of his dream, in which “HaShem was standing over him, and He said, “I am HaShem, the G-d of Avraham your father, and the G-d of Yitzchak; the land upon which you are lying to you I will give it and to your seed. And your seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and you shall gain strength westward and eastward and northward and southward; and through you shall be blessed all the families of the earth and through your seed. And behold, I am with you, and I will guard you wherever you go, and I will restore you to this land, for I will not forsake you until I have done what I have spoken concerning you.” (ibid 28:13-15)

So to whom did this tiny parcel of land upon which Yaakov slept, (of which our sages say contained within its diminutive perimeter the entire length and breadth of the land of Israel, all rolled up, as it were, in this place, for the purpose of verifying G-d’s words), belong? Did it belong to Yaakov and his seed, as G-d claimed, or did it belong to G-d, as Yaakov insisted upon awakening and stating “This is none other than the house of G-d, and this is the gate of heaven.”

The beauty of this O. Henry-like conundrum, is not merely that both parties are correct in their insistence that the place – HaMakom – belongs to the other, but that this very dispute embodies the deepest expression of love and represents the making of a covenant between Yaakov, on behalf of himself and his seed, for generations to come, and G-d: What’s mine is yours – the House of G-d is also the House of Yaakov, as conveyed by the prophet Isaiah, “And many peoples shall go, and they shall say, ‘Come, let us go up to HaShem’s mount, to the house of the G-d of Yaakov, and let Him teach us of His ways, and we will go in His paths,’ for out of Zion shall the Torah come forth, and the word of HaShem from Jerusalem.” (Isaiah 2:3)

To paraphrase the classic lines from Casablanca, “Of all the the places (HaMakom) in all the towns in all the world, he (Yaakov) walks into Mine!” Of course, Yaakov didn’t merely happen to walk into and lay down his head and go to sleep upon the place of the House of G-d – the Holy Temple – but was led there by G-d and by his love for and faith in G-d. Until now Yaakov was concerned with attaining his father’s blessing. Now he has received G-d’s blessing. Your house is My house and My house is yours – this is the perfect description of all that the Holy Temple would become, and why it is so precious in G-d’s eyes and in the hearts of the sons of Yaakov, the children of Israel. To further quote from the movies, this nightime encounter between Yaakov and G-d was surely “the beginning of a beautiful friendship.” And, of course, “We will always have Jerusalem – the place of the Holy Temple, the House of the G-d of Yaakov!”

SOURCE: The Temple Institute Rabbi Chaim Richman

 

ANALYSIS: Why is Jordan’s increasingly hostile to Israel?

Arutz Sheva – Israel National News

Jordan demands Israeli mayors remove religious items, conducts military exercise against Israeli ‘invasion.’

 

Yochanan Visser, 04/12/19 17:22

 

King Abdullah II

King Abdullah II

Reuters

A serious incident on the Jordanian Israeli border near Eilat on Tuesday once again showed how Jordan has become a hostile entity for Israel and information provided by two members of the Jordanian opposition in exile sheds new light on the behavior of King Abdullah II.

The incident at the Jordanian-Israeli border near Eilat involved a large group of Israeli deputy-mayors who wanted to travel to the ancient city of Petra in Jordan but were humiliated by Jordanian border guards.

The Jordanians ordered the group to remove their yarmulkes, Tzitzit (fringed religious garments) and other Jewish symbols after which they confiscated them.

Most delegates refused to take the items off, however, after which the whole group decided to cancel the trip and to return to a hotel in Eilat.

This wasn’t the first time Jordanian border guards demanded Jews remove religious items but the timing of this incident indicated that relations with Jordan indeed hit an all-time low as King Abdullah II recently said during a visit to the United States.

Last week the Jordanian army conducted a large-scale drill involving F-16 warplanes and helicopters and the aim of the drill was simulating a war with Israel as became apparent from a report by the official Jordanian news agency Petra.

The aim of the exercise was “destroying the vanguard of the enemy and the bridges that can be used as crossing points,” according to Abdullah’s mouthpiece.

Over the past two months other incidents such as the arrest and trial of Konstatin Kotov, a Russian Israeli citizen, and the subsequent refusal to release the man after Israel made a concession and released two Jordanians who were held in custody for terrorist activity indicate something is changing in the relations between the two countries and not for the better.

Most observers say that the King’s behavior toward Israel should be understood as a sign of displeasure with Israel’s policies toward the Palestinian Arabs but members of the Jordanian opposition beg to differ.

Israeli analyst Amos Harel, for example, thinks the war simulating drill was a message of anger toward Israel over the plan to annex the Jordan Valley.

“Which mysterious, unnamed country is threatening Jordan from the west?” Harel wrote adding that “the exercise meshes with the clear anti-Israel rhetoric being heard recently in the Jordanian media.”

It’s true that Abdullah expressed his anger over the Israeli plan to annex the Jordan Valley and warned it would have “major consequences” for Israeli Jordanian relations but Abed Almaala, the son of the late elder of elders of the large (1 million people) Bani Hassan tribe in Jordan and a member of the Jordanian opposition in exile says internal problems cause the King’s deliberate escalation of the hostilities against Israel.

Almaala said during an interview with Arutz 7 that respect for the King, who according to Jordanian law can’t be insulted ( read criticized) because he’s a descendant of the Prophet Mohammed, has disappeared.

Jordan nears bankruptcy Amaala said and pointed to the fact that virtually every Jordanian knows the King and his family (100 persons) spent $2 billion annually on their lavish lifestyle while the average Jordanian is living close or below the poverty line.

“The regime is done” it may take a few months or maximal a year or two before Abdullah will be forced out of his palace according to Almaala.

He effectively confirmed what the Israeli intelligence service Mossad reported to Yesha Council head Danny Dayan at the end of 2014: the Hashemite Kingdom “will be replaced within a generation.”

A recent video showing a demonstration against the King by members of the influential Bani Hassan tribe and videos about earlier demonstrations seem to support Almaala’s claim that the regime of King Abdullah is in danger.

The demonstrators angrily shouted that they would attack the King’s palace and that Abdullah and his family would not be able to sleep anymore while they threatened to kidnap tourists in order to deprive the King of his wealth.

Mudar Zahran, the leader of the Jordanian opposition in exile, said during an interview with Arutz 7 that “people don’t understand the magnitude of what is happening with the King.”

Abdullah is trying to contain a slowly increasing uprising against him according to Zahran and Israel and the United States are not paying enough attention to what’s happening.

The opposition is slowly “making the King bleed to death,” Zahran said adding that Israel should understand that Abdullah has become an enemy of the Jewish state.

The Jordanian ruler is also collaborating with Iran according to the Jordanian Palestinian leader.

The Iranians have a permanent intelligence team in Amman which is advising Abdullah on how to deal with the increasing demonstrations against Zahran claimed.

He also said that Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) which is exporting the revolution, had paid a secret visit to Jordan four months ago.

Israel will witness more Jordanian hostility Zahran predicted and it will only increase more as long as Abdullah’s rule is in danger.

“This man is a mutual enemy” the opposition leader said adding that he warned Israel already a decade ago about what is happening now.

He recalled that Abdullah was the only Arab leader who supported the nuclear deal with Iran and sent Jordanian jihadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to Iraq where he became the leader of the local Al-Qaeda branch and led the battle against the US army in Fallujah.

Palestinians???

Palestinians??? The Arabs exercised their right to self-determinism when they voted for Abdullah I the King of Jordan to be their sovereign at the December 1948 Jericho Conference. Then they tried to overthrow the Hashemites during “Black September 1970” and now they claim the Oslo Accords gives them rights. Under Oslo they exercise full autonomy so what Arabs is it that she [Ilhan Omar] talking about??? In 1977, Zuheir Mohsen, PLO Executive Council member, articulated the goals of the new “peoplehood” strategy saying, “The Palestinian people does not exist…. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel…. It is only for political and tactical reasons that we speak today about…the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism.”
Moreover, As Hamas Minister of the Interior and of National Security Fathi Hammad speaking on Al-Hekma TV said in March 2012: “Brothers, half of the Palestinians are Egyptians and the other half are Saudis. Who are the Palestinians? We have many families called Al-Masri, whose roots are Egyptian. Egyptian! They may be from Alexandria, from Cairo, from Dumietta, from the North, from Aswan, from Upper Egypt. We are Egyptians…”