I read the Article – Canada Votes for Anti-Israel UN Resolution.
Here is my response:
The Arabs of Palestinian extraction exercised “Self -Determinism” at the December 1948 Jericho Conference when their delegates voted for Abdullah I of trans-Jordan to be their sovereign. So what is the “Question of Palestine” the UNGA keeps bringing up?
More importantly, the Canadian Supreme Court in Delgamuukw v British Columbia,  3 SCR 1010, recognizes that the right of “aboriginal title” of indigenous populations to self-determinism trumps colonial dispossession (foreign conquest) which is an important distinction for the right of Jews who alone are indigenous to Eretz Yisrael. (The Arabs are indigenous to Arabia and were given independence via the Kingdom of the Hejaz…!) The right of Jews to “close settlement and territorial integrity” on the land is guaranteed by the Anglo-American Treaty of 1924. Because Eretz Yisrael (historical “Palestine”) are treaty lands; only those who possess sovereignty under the Montevideo Convention can lawfully dispose of this territory through the execution of a TREATY. The Arabs of Palestinian extraction are not a State as defined by that Convention since the PA does not have the power to execute a treaty!
As well, (as I posit in my proposed “Jerusalem Material Claims Conference Against the Arab League”) the Canadian Treaty Lands Entitlement Agreements process provides an important model for a comprehensive settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict that “Land Reserves” be set aside [in a trusteeship agreement] for close Jewish and Arab settlement of historical Palestine both east and west of the Jordan River as contemplated by the Faisal-Weizmann Agreement.
Just because King Hussein attempted to cede Judea and Shomron / Samaria to the PLO and disenfranchised the Arabs of Palestinian extraction from representation in the Jordanian Parliament does not mean that they have not exercised “self-determinism” within the meaning of international law.
Lest we forget, “Black September 1970” was an attempt by the Arabs of Palestinian extraction to overthrow the Hashemite Monarchy (that was established in violation of Articles 5, 15, and 25 of the Mandate for Palestine). The Hashemite Monarchy, which the Arabs themselves “voted into power” as “an expression of the will of the people” at the Jericho Conference led by Hebron sheik Muhammad Ali al Jabari, is an apartheid sovereignty as Articles 5, 15 and 25 of the Mandate for Palestine and historical facts demonstrate! This is because the Hashemites are a “foreign power” having their origins in the Kingdom of the Hejaz and their Constitution excludes Jews from Citizenship in that kingdom in violation of “Treaty Law” (to wit, Article 15 of the Mandate for Palestine and the Anglo-American Treaty of 1924) and the Faisal-Weizmann Agreement.
As Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine only permitted the Administration of those territories east of the Jordan River on a temporary basis, it was a violation of the raison d’etre of the Mandate for Palestine for the UK to exclude Jewish settlement east of the Jordan River and to establish the Hashemites as a [foreign] sovereign over Jewish territory as contemplated by the Faisal-Weizmann Agreement and the San Remo Resolution.
It’s time to put their history as colonial invaders of Eretz Yisrael in a proper light …. By Eretz Yisrael, I mean historical Israel as described in the Torah and Tanak both east and west of the Jordan River.
Yochanan Ezra ben Avraham