Netanyahu: ‘A struggle is now being waged for the heart of Jerusalem’

May 10, 2021 Netanyahu: ‘A struggle is now being waged for the heart of Jerusalem’Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Flash90/Yonatan Sindal)

Netanyahu referred to the “forces of intolerance” and evinced his support for the Israeli police as they battle to restore order in Jerusalem.

By World Israel News Staff

“A struggle is now being waged for the heart of Jerusalem,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday, addressing recent Arab violence plaguing the city. He made his remarks at a state memorial ceremony for Ethiopian Jews who perished on their way to Israel.

“It is not a new struggle. It is the struggle between intolerance and tolerance, between law-breaking violence and law and order. This struggle is not new because it has been waged, in effect, over Jerusalem and the heart of Jerusalem for hundreds of years, since the rise of the three monotheistic faiths,” he said.

On Monday, which is Jerusalem Day, an annual celebration of the unification of the capital during the Six Day War, Arabs rioted on the Temple Mount and in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah. They threw stones and launched fireworks at police. They also attacked civilians, in one case, causing a driver to crash.

Netanyahu emphasized in his speech that when Jerusalem was in the hands of others, freedom of worship was restricted, but “only under Israeli sovereignty since 1967, have we witnessed a prolonged, stable and safe period in which we have been working to ensure freedom of worship and tolerance for all.”

Presumably referring to the Palestinian provocateurs, he said, “This is not a mission that we can carry out without conflict from time to time with those same forces of intolerance that want to expropriate our rights – first of all our rights, but not just ours – on the Temple Mount and other holy sites.”

“We insist on ensuring the rights of everyone, this occasionally requires taking a strong stand as the officers of the Israel Police, and our security forces, are doing at the moment.

“We back them in this just struggle. Of course, these things are being expressed erroneously and misleadingly in the global media. In the end truth will win but we must constantly reiterate it,” Netanyahu said.

Israel has banned Jews going up to the Temple Mount during Jerusalem Day as the result of the violence, an apparent win for the rioters. However, it hasn’t cancelled a flags parade, one of the staple events of the holiday, in which thousands stream through the Old City carrying Israeli flags. Police estimated 30,000 will take part.

ISLAM TEACHES SEXUAL IMMORALITY

Posted on

1.) PEDOPHILIA IS TAUGHT 

[Koran 65:4] And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women – if you doubt, then their (waiting) period is three months (relating to divorce), and [also for] those who did not menstruate. And for those who are pregnant, their term is until they give birth. 

COMMENT: . . . and [also for] those who did not menstruate . . . this means that marrying or having sex with a child is permissible in Islam. This teaching is disgusting, the god of Muhammad is unaware of the psychological and physical effects on the child. Only idiotic parents can afford to give their child daughters in marriage.

Muhammad Had Sex With A Nine-year Old Child 

[Sunan Abu Dawud, Number 2116]:

Aisha said: The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) married me when I was seven years old. The narrator Sulaiman said: Or six years. He had intercourse with me when I was nine years old.

[Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311]:

‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

COMMENT: The Hadith above proves that Muhammad had sexed with a nine year-old child who was still playing dolls. Morally and Scientifically, this act is wrong. Had Muhammad really inspired by God Yahweh, he could not have done this wicked thing. It is no doubt that marrying a child is permissible in Islam because their prophet did so. After all, he’s the moral model of Muslims, worthy of emulation, the holy one in Islam. Devoted Muslims strictly imitate their holy prophet the reason why terrorism, murders, and rapes are spread in the world. Parents normally protect their child from harm even from mosquito bite, how much more from sexual intercourse? Muhammad is certainly a pedophile, I could not imagine how a filthy man could be regarded as holy? Holy means Godly, divine, perfect, pure, or sinless. Jesus was the only holy or sinless man who lived on Earth. 

Allah Have Prepared Fresh Boys for Their Faithful Believers 

[Koran 52:24] “And there shall wait on them young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls.” 

[Koran 76:19] And round about them will (serve) youths of perpetual (freshness): If thou seest them, thou wouldst think them scattered Pearls.

Muhammad Sucked the Tongues of Boys 

[Syrian Biography of Muhammad written by Al-Amin Al-Mamoun, Chapter Title: The first people to believe in the prophet]:

For it was narrated by Fatimah Bint Asad, the mother of Ali who related that when she gave birth to her son, it was the prophet who named him Ali and the prophet spat in Ali’s mouth then allowed to suck on his tongue till he fell asleep. 

[Musnad Ahmad, Hadith number: 16245, Volume Title: The Sayings of the Syrians, Chapter Title: Hadith of Muawiya Ibn Abu Sufyan]:

Narrated by Hisham Ibn Kasim, narrated by Huraiz, narrated by Abdul Rahman Ibn Abu Awf Al Jarashy, and narrated by Muawiya who said, “I saw the prophet (pbuh) sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the prayers of Allah be upon him . For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire) 

Muhammad Kissed A Boy’s Little Penis 

[Hadith number 16245 Volume title, the sayings of the Syrians Hadith of Mu’ awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan]:

He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart and kissed his (little) penis

2.) RAPING A SLAVE OR CAPTIVE GIRL IS ALLOWED EVEN IF THEY ARE MARRIED TO PAGANS 

[Koran 4:24] Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you seek them from your property, desiring chastity, not fornication. So with those among them whom you have enjoyed, give them their required due, but if you agree mutually after the requirement (has been determined), there is no sin on you. Surely, Allah is Ever All-Knowing, All-Wise. 

COMMENT:  . . . except those whom your right hands possess . . . this refers to the girl possessed by a Muslim. This means that a Muslim man is not forbidden to have sex with their captive girls whether they are married or not to non-Muslims, and whether she likes it or not. My question to Islam apologists, what if your wife, daughter, or sister becomes a slave of your neighbor? how would you feel if your neighbor raped her? This commandment is also extended to non-Muslim girls, where raping them is allowed in Islam. Allah claimed that he’s the most merciful and forgiving god in Koran, but sadly he has no mercy for girls, he made them sex objects for Muslim men, as a result, they have lesser value in Islamic society.

Muhammad Raped A Captive Girl 

[Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:60]:

After the fall of Khyber, people described the beauty of Safia Bint Hui, the new bride of a slain enemy soldier. The Prophet chose her for himself. On the way to Madina he stopped and had intercourse with her. His companions did not know if she was a wife or a concubine. Later, a veil was drawn between her and the men-folk and they came to know that she was a wife. 

Allah Allowed Muslims To Rape Their Married Female Captives

[Sunan Abu Dawud 2150 & Muslim 3433]:

Abu Said al-Khudri said: “The apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives because of their pagan husbands. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse, “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess”. That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.” 

Muhammad Says Raping Bondwomen Is Not A Sin 

[Bukhari Kitabul Qadr 3:543]:

A man inquired, “We earn income from these bondwomen, (other narratives mention prostitution) so can we do coitus interrupts with them?” The Prophet said, “There is no sin in doing that” 

Allah Says Muslims Who Raped Their Slaves Are Surely Not To Be Blamed 

[Koran 70:29-30] And those who guard their private parts, except in the case of their wives or those whom their right hands possess– for these surely are not to be blamed. 

COMMENT: This explains why domestic helpers in Islamic countries are raped by their bosses for they regarded them as slaves. Because of this wicked commandment, Muslim men feel emboldened to rape their slaves because they know that this act is not a sin against their god. 

3.) SELLING BONDWOMEN FOR SEX IS ALLOWED BY ALLAH AND MUHAMMAD 

[Bukhari Kitabul Qadr 3:543]:

A man inquired, “We earn income from these bondwomen, (other narratives mention prostitution) so can we do coitus interrupts with them?” The Prophet said, “There is no sin in doing that” 

COMMENT: . . . “We earn income from these bondwomen, . . . This means that the pioneers of Islam were selling women for sex, this is a clear prostitution. This is one of the proofs that Islam is not a religion, but a political group formed to dominate other people and grabbed their wealth through violence. Muhammad just concocted supposed divine revelations to make sure that his men would follow him. God does not change His mind and alter His words, that after He founded His Church (Catholicism), He later changed His mind and founded another churches through a man, kindly read;

[1 Samuel 15:29] “Also the Glory of Israel will not lie or change His mind; for He is not a man that He should change His mind.” 

[Psalm 89:34] “My covenant I will not violate, Nor will I alter the utterance of My lips.

. . . “There is no sin in doing that” . . . This means that after the Jihadists enslaved the non-Muslim girls, killed their relatives, and pimped them; it is also not sinful for the Jihadists to rape them. What a teaching! This god and prophet of Islam certainly have no remorse.

[Koran 4:24] And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah’s ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise. 

COMMENT: . . . Then as to those whom you profit by . . . this sentence points out the profit made by early Muslim men through pimping their slave or captive women after raping them.Most translations evade this wording perhaps to cover their Scripture’s immorality, and instead put an alternative wording  like. . . for the enjoyment you had from them . . . Yusuf Ali translated this as . . . seeing that ye derive benefit from them . . .  

4.) INCEST IS ALLOWED  

Sex Between Father and His Illegitimate Daughter Is Allowed 

[Commentary by Al-Qurtubi on Surah 4:23]:

For Allah, exalted and glorified, said in Surah 4:23, “Your wives’ mothers,” But did not say, “He who committed adultery with his wives’ mothers, nor his daughter whom he conceived through adultery.” 

[Al Fiqh ‘ala Al Madhahib Al Arba’ah by Abd al-Rahman al-Jaziri, Volume 4, p. 40]:

“It is permissible for a man to marry his daughter who is born through adultery.” “The one (girl) who is born through adultery does not become mahram (to her father) as the Shafiee say, because she is not considered as daughter since there is no inheritance between them.” 

Allah Is Much Concerned With Muhammad’s Sexual Pleasure, And Authorized Him To Have Sex With His Captive Women And His Close Relatives 

[Koran 33:50] O Prophet, indeed We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have given their due compensation and those your right hand possesses from what Allah has returned to you [of captives] and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who emigrated with you and a believing woman if she gives herself to the Prophet [and] if the Prophet wishes to marry her, [this is] only for you, excluding the [other] believers. We certainly know what We have made obligatory upon them concerning their wives and those their right hands possess, [but this is for you] in order that there will be upon you no discomfort. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful. 

5.) NECROPHILIA IS ALLOWED 

[Book Of Purity Chapter Of Washing, Imgur]:

A dead body need not be washed after you have sexual intercourse with her 

[Chapter of sexual intercourse with a dead body P.263, Imgur]:

Dowry must be paid for sexual intercourse with a dead woman who is not his wife, but if she is his wife then no need whether dead or alive 

Muhammad Had sex With His Dead Aunt 

[The issues of women, Kanz Al Umal (“The Treasure of the Workers”) by Ali Ibn Husam]:

“I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I SLEPT with her, in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib”… The prophet was referring to Fatima, the mother of Ali. 

Muhammad Asked His Believer To Have Sex With A Dead Woman 

[Sahih Bukhari Volume 002, Book 023, Hadith Number 374]:

Narated By Anas bin Malik : We were (in the funeral procession) of one of the daughters of the Prophet and he was sitting by the side of the grave. I saw his eyes shedding tears. He said, “Is there anyone among you who did not have sexual relations with his wife last night?” Abu Talha replied in the affirmative. And so the Prophet told him to get down in the grave. And so he got down in her grave. 

6.) BESTIALITY AND SODOMY ARE ALLOWED WHETHER THE SEX PARTNER IS ALIVE OR DEAD 

[Sahih Muslim, Book of Menstruation, Hadith 525]:

“Our companions have said if a penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus or penile anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus, then it is necessary to wash…”

[Book Of Purity Chapter Of Washing, Imgur]:

He who has sexual intercourse with a dead body or an animal shall not be punished 

[Book Of Purity Chapter Of Washing, Imgur]:

If the male genitalia completely entered a woman’s behind, or a man’s behind or a baheema (animal) from behind or vagina, he must be washed whether it was alive or dead, young or old 

Muhammad Had Sex With Camels  

[Sahih al-Bukhari 2357]:

Ibn Sharib narrated, Ibn Abdul Talib said: “Always when his wives had their period, I saw the Prophet (pbuh) near by his camel herd. There he had lovingly intercourse with the female animals, sometimes he also turned towards the young animals of both sexes.” Islam Allows Bestiality and Sodomy

7.) MARRYING MANY WIVES IS TAUGHT 

[Koran 4:3] And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the right course. 

[Fatawa Islamiyah Darussalam Vol. 5 No. 353]:

It is not obligatory for the husband, when he wishes to marry another, to get his first wife’s acceptance, but it is a noble trait of character and good relations for him to appease her by whatever decreases the pain which woman naturally feel in such situations. This may be achieved by smiling, greeting her warmly and speaking kindly to her, and by whatever money you can afford, if her acceptance requires it. 

COMMENT: This commandment is utterly unfair to a Muslim wife. Not only she will get hurt by her husband’s second marriage, but also she is deprived of her marital right. Scornfully, to appease the pain in her, the husband just smile at her and speak to her kindly. This is the advice of Allah, the all-wise and all-knowing. Likewise, the statement above admits that the first wife gets hurt when her husband marries another. Even Muhammad asked his son-in-law not to marry another woman for his daughter (Fatima) will get hurt (Volume 4, Book 53, No. 342). Why he practiced polygamy when he saw it hurting on his part? Clearly, Muhammad and his god have no remorse for another’s feelings. Is this Godly? Allah claimed that They are the most merciful, but why They have no mercy for women, and even will send most of them to hell? They are so unfair, God Jesus treats man and woman equally. Why is it Allah and Muhammad have the same attitude? Because Muhammad is Allah himself. Allah could not move, see, talk, and hear for it is an idol, the moon god. Historically, Allah was a pagan god, and believed to have three daughters which are also mentioned in Koran 53:19-20.  

8.) ALLAH AUTHORIZED MUHAMMAD TO MARRY HIS DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 

[Quran 33:37] And [remember, O Muhammad], when you said to the one on whom Allah bestowed favor and you bestowed favor, “Keep your wife and fear Allah ,” while you concealed within yourself that which Allah is to disclose. And you feared the people, while Allah has more right that you fear Him. So when Zayd had no longer any need for her, We married her to you in order that there not be upon the believers any discomfort concerning the wives of their adopted sons when they no longer have need of them. And ever is the command of Allah accomplished. 

COMMENT: According to reports, Muhammad went to the house of Zayd, and accidentally saw Zaynab’s naked body which attracted him sexually. Zaynab was the wife of Zayd, Muhammad’s adopted son. Since he had four wives already as prescribed in Koran and also marrying his adopted son’s wife is against the pre-Islamic code of ethics, the Koranic verse above supposedly revealed to him by Allah, giving him the right to satisfy his sexual interest in Zaynab. To cover this sexual goal, Muhammad (or Allah) reasoned out that this revelation is just a guide for future Muslims who want to marry their adopted son’s divorcee. Sensing that the prophet attracted to his wife and believing that he could go to Heaven by being generous to his prophet, Zayd divorced his wife to give way to his prophet’s desire. Even Aisha marveled at the quickness of Allah to answer her husband’s desire. After this event, Muhammad took another wives and concubines mostly from war captives. Most of these women were married. 

9.) ALLAH AUTHORIZED MUHAMMAD TO HAVE SEX WITH THE WOMEN WHO WANT TO GIVE THEIR VAGINAS TO HIM 

(Koran 33:50) Prophet, We have made lawful for you your wives whom you have given their dowry, slave girls whom God has given to you as gifts, the daughters of your uncles and aunts, both paternal and maternal, who have migrated with you. The believing woman, who has offered herself to the Prophet and whom the Prophet may want to marry, will be specially for him, not for other believers. We knew what to make obligatory for them concerning their wives and slave girls so that you would face no hardship (because we have given distinction to you over the believers). God is All-forgiving and All-merciful.

Women Offered Their Vaginas To Muhammad 

[Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 48]:

Narrated Hisham’s father: Khaula bint Hakim was one of those ladies who presented themselves to the Prophet. ‘Aisha said, “Doesn’t a lady feel ashamed for presenting herself to a man?”

[Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 53]:

Narrated Thabit Al-Banani: “A woman came to Allah’s Apostle and presented herself to him, saying, ‘O Allah’s Apostle, have you any need for me ?’ “Thereupon Anas’s daughter said, “What a shameless lady she was! Shame! Shame!” Anas said, “She was better than you; she had a liking for the Prophet. 

10.) SEX WITH FRUITS IS ALLOWED

[Bada’i al-Fuwa’id of Ibn Qayyim (Islamic scholar), page 129]:

“If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”. “If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a penis, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber”.

11.) CONTRACT SEX (NIKAH MUT’AH) IS TAUGHT 

[Ibn Kathir’s explanation on Quran 4:24]: 

“. . . (O people! I allowed you the Mut`ah marriage with women before. Now, Allah has prohibited it until the Day of Resurrection. Therefore, anyone who has any women in Mut`ah, let him let them go, and do not take anything from what you have given them.) Allah’s statement, (but if you agree mutually (to give more) after the requirement (has been determined), there is no sin on you.) is similar to His other statement, . . . “

[Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3255]:

“Sabra al-Juhanni reported on the authority of his father that while he was with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon hm) he said: 0 people, I had permitted you to contract temporary marriage with women . . . ” 

[Muwatta Imam Malik, Book 28, Number 28.18.42]:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Urwa ibn az-Zubayr that Khawla ibn Hakim came to Umar ibn al-Khattab and said, ”Rabia ibn Umayya made a temporary marriage with a woman and she . . . ”

12.) IN ORDER FOR A MUSLIMA TO BE UNLAWFUL FOR A MAN TO MARRY HER, SHE JUST NEEDS TO SUCKLE HIM TEN TIMES 

Muhammad Commanded A Woman To Suckle An Adult Man 

[Sahih Muslim 1453a]: 

A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be eupon him) and said:

Messengerof Allah, I see on the face of Abu Hudhaifa (signs of disgust) on entering of Salim (who is an ally) into (our house), whereupon Allah’s Apostle (ﷺ) said: Suckle him. She said: How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man? Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) smiled and said: I already know that he is a young man ‘Amr has made this addition in his narration that he participated in the Battle of Badr and in the narration of Ibn ‘Umar (the words are): Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) laughed.

[Sahih Muslim 8:3425]: 

‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. She (i. e. the daughter of Suhail came to Allah’s Apostle ﷺ and said: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain, and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that something (rankles) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa, whereupon Allah’s Apostle ﷺ said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.

Allah Revealed A Verse Of Suckling An Adult 

[Ibn Majah Volume 3, Book 9, Hadith 1944 & Sahih Muslim 1453]:

It was narrated that ‘Aishah said: “The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.”

13.) ALLAH KEEPS EVER-VIRGIN SEX SLAVES IN HIS PARADISE FOR THE MUSLIM FIGHTERS, CLOSELY GUARDED THEM IN PAVILIONS 

[Quran 52:20] They will recline (with ease) on Thrones (of dignity) arranged in ranks; and We shall join them to Companions, with beautiful big and lustrous eyes.

[Quran 55:70-74] Therein are those of modest gaze, whom neither man nor jinni will have touched before them. Wherein (are found) the good and beautiful-
Fair ones, close-guarded in pavilions –
Whom neither man nor jinni will have touched before them

[Quran 56:22-23] And (there will be) Companions with beautiful, big, and lustrous eyes,- Like unto Pearls well-guarded.

[Ishaq: 349] “The battle will tell the world about us. Distant men will heed our warning. The infidels may cut off my leg, yet I am a Muslim. I will exchange my life for one with VIRGINS fashioned like the most beautiful statues.” 

COMMENT: This statement of Ali confirms that Jihadists expect virgins in afterlife. For they so believe the lies of their prophet that they will get 72 virgins as award if they fight for Allah’s cause.

14.) ALLAH WILL MAKE THE PENIS OF JIHADIST EVER-ERECT TO MATCH THE 72 DELICIOUS EVER-VIRGIN VAGINAS IN HIS PARADISE

[Sunan Ibn Majah, Zuhd (Book of Abstinence) 39]:

“Abu Umama narrated: “The Messenger of God said, ‘Everyone that God admits into paradise will be married to 72 wives; two of them are houris and seventy of his inheritance of the [female] dwellers of hell. All of them will have libidinous sex organs and he will have an ever-erect penis” 

[Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur’an, p. 351]:

Each time we sleep with a Houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternalthe sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [i.e. Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas. 

Evangelical leader: Check Rep Omar’s ties to Muslim Brotherhood

“How can a representative of the US raise money for terrorist groups that seek our demise while serving as a member of Congress?”

 

Arutz Sheva Staff, 07/03/19 12:47

 

Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Reuters

Laurie Cardoza-Moore, president of Proclaiming Justice to The Nations (PJTN) has called upon the U.S. Justice Department to launch a full and thorough investigation into Ilhan Omar’s possible connections to the subversive Muslim Brotherhood group. Cardoza-Moore, who hosts the popular Christian television program Focus On Israel which reaches a global weekly audience of over one billion viewers in 200 nations, has launched a nationwide campaign and petition demanding Omar’s dismissal from Congress. Now she has revealed that Omar may be in violation of a federal statute by fundraising for Muslim Brotherhood affiliates whose mission is to destroy America.

“While she has already established her credentials as a vehement anti-Semite, Ilhan Omar is far worse than that. Omar may be in violation of a federal statute for fundraising for two Muslim Brotherhood charities that seek to destroy America. We the people demand that the Justice Department conduct a full and thorough investigation into her possible connections with the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates. Omar’s anti-Semitic comments do not reflect the values of Americans,” said Laurie Cardoza-Moore. The recent revelation of Omar’s participation as a keynote speaker at events for the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated groups IRUSA and CAIR suggests her support for subversive factions aligned to destroy America and Western civilization itself.

Cardoza-Moore added: “American patriots have signed our petition in the tens of thousands. We won’t stop our national campaign until Ilhan Omar is fully investigated and justice is served. How can a representative of the United States raise money for terrorist groups that seek our demise and equally serve on the House Foreign Relations Committee, or for that matter, as a member of Congress?”

Omar was a keynote speaker for Islamic Relief USA in Tampa, FL last month and will be keynote speaker at an upcoming Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) fundraiser in Los Angeles. CAIR is the American arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, in addition to close ties to Hamas and Hezbollah, CAIR was listed as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the largest terrorist fundraising operation in the history of the United States known as the Holy Land Foundation Trial in 2009.

During the Holy Land Foundation investigation, the FBI uncovered an internal Muslim Brotherhood memo, An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America 5/22/1991, which mapped out the organization’s plan to infiltrate and destroy America. The memorandum stated: The Ikhwan [brothers] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

At the conclusion of the trial, David Kris, then Assistant Attorney General for National Security stated, “These sentences should serve as a strong warning to anyone who knowingly provides financial support to terrorists under the guise of humanitarian relief.”

Additionally, IRUSA is an arm of the largest Muslim fundraising group globally whose leaders have ties to terrorist groups. According to a 36-page report from the Middle East Forum, the founder of Islamic Relief, Hany El-Banna, has been involved with several organizations with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, including once serving as the trustee of the Muslim Aid charity that has funneled money to Hamas.

As a student, El-Banna was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood organization Federation of Student Islamic Societies. El-Banna has also praised the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan Al Bana for being “held in so much awe and respect.”

Is IRUSA hiding behind the same “humanitarian-aide” cloak the Holy Land Foundation did? Is Ilhan Omar helping to advocate the support of the Muslim Brotherhood’s overthrow of our Government? American citizens demand an answer to these questions!

Under 18 U.S. Code § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government: “Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof-Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned…”

Proclaiming Justice to The Nations (PJTN), a 501c3 non-profit organization, was established to educate Christians to stand with Jews and Israel against the rise of global anti-Semitism. In recent months the organization has led the struggle against BDS in America with a wave of state resolutions and as exposed textbooks used in U.S. schools that are indoctrinating our children with inaccurate historical information, bias and values that do not reflect our nation. Laurie Cardoza-Moore, president of Proclaiming Justice to The Nations is the show host of the Evangelical docu-style program Focus On Israel which reaches a weekly global audience of over 1 billion in 200 nations.

antisemitism, amending the the Israeli Law of Return, the Diaspora and UNGA Resolution 194(11)

B”H

Rabbi (Et. Al.) –

 

My thoughts on the rise of antisemitism, amending the the Israeli Law of Return, the Diaspora and UNGA Resolution 194(11) :

First, “Anti-Semitism has become mainstream – from the halls of Congress to the leader of the opposition in Britain,” Ya’acov Berman, Chabad Activist, NY.

In order to counter “antisemitism” and the [Palestinian] Arab’s claim for a right of return based on UNGA Resolution 194 (11); the State of Israel should amend the Law of Return and collectively naturalize (viz “PATRIATE”) all Jews of the Diaspora (e.g. Orthodox, Conservative and Reform) under the Law of Return – In this way, all Jews would be provided Israeli Consular Services and “enhanced protection services” at Synagogues and Jewish Community Centers would be ensured  and Jews would outnumber, that is, hold a demographic majority over the Arabs even if all Arabs of Palestinian extraction were absorbed by M’dinat Yisrael (the State of Israel)!
Second, UNGA Resolution 194(11) is premised on two conditions: the “return of Palestinians to Eretz Yisrael at the earliest practicable date, & on those wishing to live at peace with their neighbor” – Given the rise in antisemitism in the Arab world it does not appear that the Palestinians wish to live at peace with their Jewish neighbor.
The earliest practicable date at which the Palestinians could have “returned to Eretz Yisrael” is any time before they were “collectively naturalized” by King Abdullah I which is December 13, 1949. See my argument below for why they chose their status in international law; whether or not that decision was a good one or a bad one is not my concern. The Palestinian’s case is one against the Hashemites, not the State of Israel.

According to wikipedia – the total number of people who hold or are eligible for Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return — defined as anyone with at least one Jewish grandparent, and who does not profess any other religion — is estimated at around 23 million, of which 6.6 million were living in Israel as of 2015. Figures for these expanded categories are less precise than for the core Jewish population.

Based on these 2015 figures, there are an estimated 17 million Jews in the Diaspora who are eligible for Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return. This number may not include the number of converts to Judaism or those Anusim (descendants of Jews forced to convert to a non-Jewish religion) who might be eligible under the Law of Return.

****

King Abdullah I of Jordan collectively naturalized all Arabs of Palestinian extraction.
The subject of collective naturalization is discussed at length in Boyd v. Thayer, 143 U. S. 135, (1892) and many cases cited and illustrations given.

Collective Naturalization can occur by legislation or by treaty.

In the case of Jordan –

On December 13, 1949, King Abdullah of Jordan passed a law amending the Law of Nationality of 1928. Accordingly, Jordanian citizenship was granted to all persons who were holding Palestinian citizenship and were habitually residing in Transjordan or in the “western area that [was] administered by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan” (i.e., Jerusalem and the West Bank). (Of note is that this law excluded Jews from possessing Jordanian citizenship! But of course the Jews were ethnically cleansed from Jordan and Judea and Samaria by the Hashemites in violation of Article 15 of the Mandate for Palestine and the Anglo-American Treaty of 1924 –

Talk about APARTHEID….)

(On the matter of why the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan was established in violation of Articles 5, 15, and 25 I can make a clear argument on each point but that is not the purpose of this –  Article 15 states, “No person shall be excluded from Palestine on the sole ground of his religious belief.” The ethnic cleansing of Jews from “Palestine” was an official act of antisemitism. No different than that of the ethnic cleansing of the rest of the Jews of the “Middle East Diaspora”…! The Anglo-American Treaty of 1924 while it replicated the Mandate for Palestine, and has expired; the right guaranteed under it to the Jewish People [see Article 80 of the UN Charter] do not expire. This is particularly true since that Treaty became the Supreme Law of the Land (USA) under our Constitutional law system, [enshrining the Mandate for Palestine and the Balfour Declaration into the official PUBLIC policy of the USA] see Howard Grief’s Book: The Legal Foundation and Borders of Israel under International Law (9789657344521).)

On April 11, 1950, parliamentary elections took place in Jordan, covering both the East Bank and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. Following these elections, the Jordanian House of Commons approved the amended law and parliament’s decision concerning the “unification of the two Banks.” Thus, Palestinians who were living in East Jerusalem and the West Bank became Jordanian citizens [by collective naturalization].
The recent de-naturalization of Jordanian citizens of “Palestinian Extraction” by King Hussein and by King Abdullah II has been found to violate the Jordanian Nationality Law. See HRW Report “Stateless Again” – The act of “disengagement” from Judea and Samaria by the Hashemites and declaring those Arabs of Palestinian Extraction (who have been de-naturalized) as Palestinian Citizens can not confer “Palestinian citizenship” on them as Palestine is not a state under the criteria of “Statehood” and must be viewed as a political stratagem designed to demographically destroy the State of Israel! (See Joel Gilbert’s documentary, “Farewell Israel” – Bush, Iran and the Revolt of Islam.) His attempt to cede Judea and Samaria in 1988 to the PLO is null and void as he renounced all claims to “the West Bank” and “what was not his to begin with was not within his power to cede!”
King Hussein explained his decision as one of deference to Palestinian wishes for national autonomy.
This statement flies in the face of the Jericho Conference of December 1948 led by Sheik Muhammad Ali Ja’abari, Mayor of Hebron and the April 1950 Parliamentary Elections wherein the Arabs of Palestinian Extraction exercised political independence and elected King Abdullah as their Sovereign!
Thus, the Palestinians acquired national autonomy when their duly elected representatives voted at the Jericho Conference in December 1948. Within a year all “non-Jewish Palestinians” were all “collectively naturalized” with the consent of the people through their elected Monarch, Abdullah I.
Just because the Hashemites have suspended the rights of the Arabs in the Lower House of Deputies and de-naturalized them should not place the onus on the State of Israel to accommodate them with a “right of return” under UNGA Res. 194(11) as they have exercised “self-determinism” under the Jericho Conference and the April 1950 Parliamentary Elections.
The US Dept. of State 1950 Report states the Jericho Conference determined the political status of the Arabs of “Central” Palestine “which took place as a result of a free expression of the will of the people.” Foreign relations of the United States, 1950. The Near East, South Asia, and Africa Volume V, Page 1096
How many times do the “Palestinians” get to decide their political status? It is evident that they chose their status (as monarchists) and are barred by the doctrine of estoppel in pais from asserting a claim of the “right of return” (to wit, a claim of Palestinian Citizenship) based on inconsistent “political” positions.
Anyways, these are my thoughts on the subject of Collective Naturalization.
Be well, blessed and a success,
Yochanan Ezra ben Avraham

Daniel prophesied about Muhammad

I think Daniel prophesied about Muhammad:

“he shall think to change the law and seasons”

“he shall not honor the desire of women” and

“he shall not honor the gods of his fathers” and

“he shall honor the god of war”

“he shall speak blaspheme against the Most High”

“he shall wear out the righteous of HaShem”

“he shall put down three rulers”

Never Forget Yathrib!

Expel Ilhan Omar From Congress

It’s not easy to get kicked out of Congress.

As evidenced by the recent proceedings of Harlem Democrat Charlie Rangel, a “censure”—which entails no actual consequences, other than those enforced by the party caucuses, usually involving removal from leadership positions and committee chairmanships—is considered harsh punishment in the halls of the U.S. Capitol, while the allegedly less serious “reprimand” triggers even less (than zero) punishment.

Only 20 members of Congress have ever been expelled since Congress began, 15 from the Senate and five from the House. Most of those cases had to do with the Civil War.

In the instant matter, Ilhan Omar is an avowed Muslim who believes Muhammad, (who had sex with Aisha when she was merely nine years old and still playing with her dolls) was a prophet.

She is alleged to have married her brother and committed immigration and student loan fraud.

Muhammad got four historical facts wrong and therefore could not be a prophet:

1) He claims Miriam, the sister of Moshe was the mother of Yeshki (Jesus), Quran – Suras 19:27-28, 3:35-36, 66:12;

2) he claims Haman of Megillat Esther was in the “court” of Pharaoh; confusing the Building of the Tower of Babel with Haman and Pharaoh, Quran – Sura 40:36-37;

3) and he claims that Pharaoh used the Roman method of crucifixion as a form of the death penalty, Qur’an – Suras 7:124, 12:41, 20:71, 26:49; 38.12, 89:6-12;

4) and conflicting Islamic sources claim either Isaac or Ishmael was offered on the Altar by Avraham.

Al-Tabari, considered to be one of the premiere Islamic historians, lists the divergent views held amongst the Muslim umma (community) in regard to this very issue:

The earliest sages of our Prophet’s nation disagree about which of Abraham’s two sons it was that he was commanded to sacrifice. Some say it was Isaac, while others say it was Ishmael. Both views are supported by statements related on the authority of the Messenger of God. If both groups of statements were equally sound, then – since they both came from the Prophet – only the Quran could serve as proof that the account naming Isaac is clearly the more truthful of the two.” (2: p. 82).

 

Moreover, Muhammad claims Yeshki was a prophet but it can be demonstrated that Yeshki falsely prophesied the restoration of the Kingdom of David within the lifetime of his disciples – Matthew 16:28, “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who shall not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” Luke 9:27 But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God.

According to the Torah, every matter of false prophesy has to be established by two or three witnesses. Here, Matthew and Luke are witnesses AGAINST Jesus and establish his false prophesy twice!

Ilhan Omar supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against the State of Israel, an American ally.

In 2018, Omar came under criticism for statements she made about Israel before she was in the Minnesota legislature, which the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported had “earned her notoriety in the pro-Israel community.” In a 2012 tweet, she wrote, “Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.” The comment, particularly the notion that Israelis had “hypnotized the world,” was criticized as drawing on anti-semitic tropes. New York Times columnist Bari Weiss wrote that Omar’s statement tied into a millennia-old “conspiracy theory of the Jew as the hypnotic conspirator”.

In February 2019, Omar was criticized for tweets that appeared to imply that money spent by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) was the primary motivation for American politicians’ support of Israel. These comments were criticized by Democratic leaders, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, and Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, with the Democratic House leadership releasing a statement that called Omar’s tweets antisemitic and “deeply offensive.” The Jewish Democratic Council of America also denounced her statements.

Omar is scheduled to speak at a fundraiser for CAIR which is a front organization for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) will be the keynote speaker at a fundraiser for the Los Angeles branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on March 23.

“Ilhan Omar pushes for release of jailed Muslim Brotherhood leader,” by Jordan Schachtel, Conservative Review, April 3, 2019:

Rep. Ilhan Omar — whose short tenure in Congress thus far has been rife with controversy — made a shocking appeal Tuesday, openly pushing for the release of a senior member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (MB).

Omar took to Twitter Tuesday evening demanding that “Trump” call for the release of Hoda Abdelmonem, a senior member in the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s women’s affiliate.

VICE PRESIDENT MIKE PENCE: Look Ilhan Omar has made statements, anti-Semitic comments, statements against our most cherished ally Israel, that ought to be rejected by every American. And frankly the fact that very recently, she’s been trying to blame the United States of America for the deprivation and the poverty brought on by the dictatorship in Venezuela. It just, it tells me -look the people of Minnesota will decide whether or not she remains in Congress. But Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has no place on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Democratic leadership ought to remove her.

In an article about U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), the manager of the Turkish state-run news channel TRT World’s Research Centre, Dr. Tarek Cherkaoui, encouraged readers to donate to Omar’s campaign fund. The article, written for the English-language website of the Turkish pro-government daily Yeni Şafakand published April 1, 2019, was titled “Media Flak Directed At Ilhan Omar No Surprise At All.” At least seven other Turkish media outlets ran the same article, in both English and in Turkish. It should be noted that U.S. federal law prohibits foreign nationals from donating to political candidates. <https://gellerreport.com/2019/07/state-run-turkish…>

As Breitbart news has noted:

In 2007-8, CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the terror financing trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. That case, in turn, led the FBI to discontinue its work with the organization. In 2009, a federal judge ruled that the government “produced ample evidence to establish” the ties of CAIR with Hamas, the Palestinian terror organization. The United Arab Emirates labeled CAIR a terrorist organization in 2014 (a decision that the Obama administration opposed).

Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood seek the destruction of not just the United States of America and Israel but of Western Society.

It’s time to remove Ilhan Omar from Congress.

Sign the Petition

the “NEW” Jordan – Sharia compliant?

Mudar Zahran: Will the “NEW” Jordan be Sharia compliant or will it be exclusively a Democratic state with a dissolution of the Monarchy? Inquiring minds want to know….
By Sharia compliant I mean to ask, will the New Jordan allow punishment for blaspheme against Muhammad, or will there be freedom of expression? Currently, Jordanian law permits punishment for the crime of blaspheme against the sensibilities of Jordanian Muslims even if “committed” in another country over the internet <https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/…/national-laws-on…>
It is an acknowledged fact that Muhammad had sex with Aisha when she was 9 years old. It can be demonstrated that Muhammad was a false prophet as Daniel prophesied: “he shall put down three rulers” (7.24) (this transpired in Yathrib
three large Jewish clans — the Banu-Nadir or “Sons of Nadir,” the Banu-Korayzeh and the Banu-Kainuka — dominated the city until Muhammad ordered their men to be slaughtered)
“he shall think to change the seasons and the law” (7.25)
“he shall not regard the desire of women” (11.37)
“he shall honor the god of war” (11.38); and,
“he shall speak words against the Most High” (Devarim 30.1-10 prophesies a restoration of the Children of Israel to HaShem and to the land of Israel; while Surah 1 condemns the Children of Israel as invoking the wrath of G-D…!)

Also, he changed the Qiblah contrary to King Solomon’s tefillah 1 Kings 8.41.

Muhammad got four historical facts wrong and therefore could not be a prophet:

1) He claims Miriam, the sister of Moshe was the mother of Yeshki (Jesus);

2) he claims Haman of Megillat Esther was in the “court” of Pharaoh;

3) and he claims that Pharaoh used the Roman method of crucifixion as a method for the death penalty;

4) and conflicting Islamic sources claim either Isaac or Ishmael was offered on the Altar by Avraham.

Moreover, Muhammad claims Yeshki was a prophet but it can be demonstrated that Yeshki falsely prophesied the restoration of the Kingdom of David within the lifetime of his disciples – Matthew 16:28, “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who shall not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” Luke 9:27 But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God.

According to the Torah, every matter of false prophesy has to be established by two or three witnesses. Here, Matthew and Luke are witnesses AGAINST Jesus and establish his false prophesy twice!

So, again, I ask, in the “New Jordan” will freedom of expression be allowed?

Yochanan Ezra ben Avraham

Muhammad, The Pedophile Prophet

How could anyone vote for someone (Ilhan Omar) who believes a pedophile (Muhammad) was a prophet? Muhammad “married” Aisha when she was 6 and consummated that “marriage” when she was 9 and still playing with her dolls.

The Islamic source materials state that Aisha was 9 when they consummated their marriage.

From the hadith of Bukhari, volume 5, #234

“Narrated Aisha: The prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six. We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Harith Kharzraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s messenger came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.”

Bukhari vol. 7, #65:

“Narrated Aisha that the prophet wrote the marriage contract with her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: “I have been informed that Aisha remained with the prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).””

From the hadith of Muslim, volume 2, #3309

Aisha reported: Allah’s Messenger married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house at the age of nine….

From the hadith of the Sunan of Abu Dawud, volume 2, #2116

“Aisha said, “The Apostle of Allah married me when I was seven years old.” (The narrator Sulaiman said: “Or six years.”). “He had intercourse with me when I was 9 years old.”

From “The History of Tabari”, volume 9, page 131

“Then the men and women got up and left. The Messenger of God consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old. Neither a camel nor a sheep was slaughtered on behalf of me”…(The Prophet) married her three years before the Emigration, when she was seven years old and consummated the marriage when she was nine years old, after he had emigrated to Medina in Shawwal. She was eighteen years old when he died.

 

Muhammad got four historical facts wrong and therefore could not be a prophet:

1) He claims Miriam, the sister of Moshe was the mother of Yeshki (Jesus), Quran – Suras 19:27-28, 3:35-36, 66:12;

2) he claims Haman of Megillat Esther was in the “court” of Pharaoh; confusing the Building of the Tower of Babel with Haman and Pharaoh, Quran – Sura 40:36-37;

3) and he claims that Pharaoh used the Roman method of crucifixion as a form of the death penalty, Qur’an – Suras 7:124, 12:41, 20:71, 26:49; 38.12, 89:6-12;

4) and conflicting Islamic sources claim either Isaac or Ishmael was offered on the Altar by Avraham.

Al-Tabari, considered to be one of the premiere Islamic historians, lists the divergent views held amongst the Muslim umma (community) in regard to this very issue:

The earliest sages of our Prophet’s nation disagree about which of Abraham’s two sons it was that he was commanded to sacrifice. Some say it was Isaac, while others say it was Ishmael. Both views are supported by statements related on the authority of the Messenger of God. If both groups of statements were equally sound, then – since they both came from the Prophet – only the Quran could serve as proof that the account naming Isaac is clearly the more truthful of the two.” (2: p. 82).

 

Maimonides refers to Muhammad as hameshuga “that madman” in his Epistle to Yemen!

Where is the Imam? 11th US Court of Appeals grants stay of execution

11th US Court of Appeals grants stay of execution because of lack of imam in execution chamber for muslim prisoner, Dominque Ray:

“Ray was convicted of raping the [fifteen years old] teen and robbing her of approximately $6 she had in her purse.”
And now it has taken him 20 years of litigation to find out his “spiritual adviser” won’t be present in the execution chamber. I would say this about his “spiritual journey” – how could one profess Muhammad was a Prophet? since when did a pedophile, Muhammad become a candidate for prophethood?

Muhammad married Aishah when she was six and consummated the “marriage” when she was still playing with her dolls at the age of nine!

Muhammad also ordered a man, Zayd to divorce his wife so Muhammad could marry her. He had ELEVEN “wives” while The Quran has four historical mistakes in it:

Islam claims –

1) Miriam the sister of Moses was the mother of Jesus

2) Ishmael rather than Isaac was offered on the Altar by Abraham

3) Haman, (in the Book of Esther from the historical event of Purim) was in the “court of Pharaoh

4) Pharaoh used crucifixion as a form of capital punishment

No “prophet” would conduct himself as Muhammad did.

No “prophet” would get historical facts wrong!!!

This condemned prisoner needs to find another “spiritual adviser” preferably from the Noahides.

Never Forget Yathrib! 

Israeli teen raised as a Muslim returns to Judaism

Arutz Sheva – Israel National News

Mordechai Sones, 20/12/18 19:32

Young man born to Jewish mother but raised in Arab village returns to Judaism.

 
Binyamin wears tefillin

Binyamin wears tefillin

Yad L’Achim

No family came to accompany 19-year-old Kamel when a Brit Yosef Yitzchak organization member performed his hatafat dam procedure, drawing a drop of blood with a pin-sized lance for those who have been circumcised but not for the sake of the Covenant of Abraham. At this time he was given his new Jewish name, Binyamin.

No family member was there, but members of Yad L’Achim who accompanied Kamel (Binyamin) in the past two years stood by him now, a day later, when he immersed in a mikveh to accept Judaism before the judges of the Haifa Rabbinical Court, and thus completed his “return to Judaism” ceremony – a special track for Jews who left their religion and are now returning to Judaism of their own free will.

Binyamin was born in a Arab village in the north of the country to a Jewish mother who immigrated to Israel from the former Soviet Union, and an Arab father. Two years after the mother converted to Islam and married the same Arab in an attempt to start a new life in the Land of Israel – to which, ironically, she immigrated from Moscow so she could live as a Jew.

After years his mother divorced the Arab father after undergoing a life of suffering and violence, but the Arab father, who was well versed in local law, succeeded in deceiving her and Binyamin was transferred to his custody.

Binyamin, who grew up as Kamel, was educated in Islam and grew up as an Arab in every respect. The torture he suffered as a son of a hated Jewish mother caused him to flee the village when he was 15 years old and roam the streets of Acco and Haifa.

His life quickly degenerated into brawls and wars of survival until he was directed to Yad L’Achim by a passing Jew who heard his story and understood that he wanted to return to the Jewish People and open a new and better chapter in his life.

Yad L’Achim hurried to meet with Binyamin and immediately began combined treatment: First, a suitable accommodation was found in an educational institution for young people from difficult backgrounds. At the same time, the organization worked to connect him with a mentor who was especially assigned to him and taught him the Hebrew language and later Judaism and Jewish heritage.

Yad L’Achim even purchased a pair of tefillin for him, helped him find suitable work during the evening hours, and gave him coupons every month for food, clothes, and personal furniture. Only a half-year after he had been picked up from the street, with much help from Heaven and greater willpower than most, Binyamin knew how to open a siddur or a Chumash and read them like one accustomed.

The decisive stage of his return to Judaism also recently ended. The request submitted by Yad L’Achim to the Beit Din for Binyamin’s return to Judaism encountered difficulties due to missing documents relating to the Jewishness of his mother, who had no family member or acquaintance in Israel. In the end, after many efforts by Yad L’Achim overseas they managed to obtain some documents, and the court decided on a special genetic test that proved beyond any doubt that Binyamin was 100 percent Jewish and derived from a Jewish family in Poland.

“Binyamin is waiting impatiently for the official document of his return to Judaism, and at the same time he began to observe Shabbat and observe kashrut and so this time too, despite the difficult personal story, we were moved to see that Israel is aware of G-d and His Torah,” Yad L’Achim said this week. “These success stories only encourage us to continue to care for thousands of Jews with similar life stories who are desperate for help. We won’t rest until we can bring them home.”